Supreme Court Decisions

Citation No.	Delivered / Published	Case Name	OIC Decision #	OIC Decision Date
940618	09/11/1994	CLEMENTS -v- KEIGHLEY-GERARDY	D00894	9/06/1994
950310; (1995) 14 WAR 550*	15/06/1995	MANLY -v- MINISTRY OF PREMIER & CABINET	D01694	16/09/1994
* Please see the Freedom of Information Amendment Act 2004 & a summary of the change to clause 5(1)(b) here
960189	04/04/1996	CLEMENTS -v- GRAYLANDS HOSPITAL & ANOR	D04995	9/11/1995
960227; (1996) 17 WAR 9*	30/04/1996	POLICE FORCE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA -v- KELLY & ANOR	D05695	24/11/1995
* Please see the Freedom of Information Amendment Act 2004 & a summary of the change to clause 5(1)(b) here
960654	13/11/1996	MINISTER FOR PLANNING -v- TAWEEL	D01896	27/03/1996
960668; (1996) 93 LGERA 69	22/11/1996	MINISTRY FOR PLANNING -v- COLLINS	D03996	05/07/1996
970646*	27/11/1997	POLICE FORCE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA -v- WINTERTON	D01597	20/05/1997
* Please see the Freedom of Information Amendment Act 2004 & a summary of the change to clause 5(1)(b) here
[1999] WASCA 233	05/11/1999	POLICE FORCE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA -v- AYTON [1999] WASCA 233	D0081999	5/05/1999
[1999] WASCA 269	30/11/1999	HEALTH DEPARTMENT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA - v- AUSTRALIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION LTD [1999] WASCA 269	D0071999	27/04/1999
[2000] WASCA 349	17/11/2000	MINISTER FOR TRANSPORT -v- EDWARDS [2000] WASCA 349	D0392000	20/07/2000
[2001] WASC 3	17/01/2001	INFORMATION COMMISSIONER FOR WESTERN AUSTRALIA -v- MINISTRY OF JUSTICE [2001] WASC 3	Referral on question of Law	-
[2001] WASCA 405 (2001) 25 WAR 147	14/12/2001	CHANNEL 31 COMMUNITY EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION LTD -v- INGLIS [2001] WASCA 405	D0252001	23/07/2001
[2003] WASCA 112	30/05/2003	TEMWOOD HOLDINGS PTY LTD -v- WESTERN AUSTRALIAN PLANNING COMMISSION & ANOR [2003] WASCA 112	D0382002	22/11/2002
[2003] WASCA 250 (2003) 28 WAR 187	15/10/2003	BGC (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD -v- FREMANTLE PORT AUTHORITY & ANOR [2003] WASCA 250	D0232002	11/07/2002
[2005] WASC 123	10/06/2005	DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND WORKS -v- BOWDEN [2005] WASC 123	D0232004	22/12/2004
[2008] WASC 39 (2008) 36 WAR 324	20/03/2008	SALARIES AND ALLOWANCES TRIBUNAL -v- WEST AUSTRALIAN NEWSPAPERS LTD [2008] WASC 39	D0202007	10/12/2007
[2010] WASC 210	17/08/2010	WATER CORPORATION -v- McKAY [2010] WASC 210	D0352009	30/12/2009
[2011] WASC 283	17/10/2011	APACHE NORTHWEST PTY LTD -v- DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND PETROLEUM [No 2] [2011] WASC 283	D0352010	30/12/2010
[2012] WASCA 167	23/08/2012	APACHE NORTHWEST PTY LTD -v- DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND PETROLEUM [2012] WASCA 167	D0352010	30/12/2010
[2015] WASCA 142	15/07/2015	H -v- THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER WA [2015] WASCA 142	*	*
[2015] WASC 276	07/08/2015	H -v- DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION [2015] WASC 276	D0212014	14/11/2014
[2016] WASC 108	06/04/2016	DEPARTMENT OF STATE DEVELOPMENT -v- LATRO LAWYERS [2016] WASC 108	D0072015	17/04/2015
[2016] WASC 272	26/08/2016	I -v- DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD [2016] WASC 272	D0222014	08/12/2014
[2016] WASC 336	17/10/2016	MORRIS -v- INFORMATION COMMISSIONER AT WA OFFICE [2016] WASC 336	*	*
[2017] WASC 305	26/10/2017	S -v- DEPARTMENT FOR CHILD PROTECTION AND FAMILY SUPPORT [2017] WASC 305	D0102017	23/05/2017
[2018] WASC 47	16/02/2018	PUBLIC TRANSPORT AUTHORITY [2018] WASC 47	D0122017	26/05/2017
[2018] WASC 245	15/08/2018	PEARLMAN -v- THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA [2018] WASC 245	**	**
[2019] WASC 257	19/07/2019	PEARLMAN -v- WA A/INFORMATION COMMISSIONER [2019] WASC 257	D0022019	08/02/2019
[2019] WASC 260	22/07/2019	S -v- DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITIES [2019] WASC 260	D0022018	19/06/2018
[2019] WASC 260 (S)	29/08/2019	S -v- DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITIES [2019] WASC 260 (S)	D0022018	19/06/2018
[2019] WASC 257 (S)	02/10/2019	PEARLMAN -v- WA A/INFORMATION COMMISSIONER [2019] WASC 257 (S)	D0022019	08/02/2019

* Please note that these Supreme Court decisions concerned decisions by the Information Commissioner to stop dealing with a complaint under section 67(1)(b) of the FOI Act. Therefore, there is no formal published decision by the Information Commissioner that is linked to any of these decisions.

** Please note that this Supreme Court appeal concerned a decision by the Information Commissioner to conciliate a complaint. Therefore, there is no formal published decision by the Information Commissioner that is linked to this appeal.